Quality evaluation of nutrition policies in early childhood education and care services in Nerang, QLD.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Food environments in early childhood, such as early childhood education and care services, influence the development of dietary patterns and behaviours that traverse into adulthood, where they affect health and longevity. Nutrition policies are mandatory in early childhood education and care services in Australia and can positively or negatively shape the food environment. However, the quality of such nutrition policies is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the comprehensiveness and strength of nutrition policies of early childhood education and care services among services participating in a university-community alliance in South East Queensland. METHODS: Early childhood education and care services (n = 12) in Nerang, Queensland, Australia, participated in a cross-sectional study evaluating the comprehensiveness and strength of nutrition policies across four domains (Nutrition Education, Nutrition Standards, Promoting Healthy Eating and Communication and Evaluation) of the Wellness in Child Care Assessment Tool. RESULTS: Nutrition policies evaluated in this study had median total comprehensiveness scores of 55 (out of 100) and median total strength scores of 19 (out of 100). 'Nutrition Education' had the highest median scores for comprehensiveness (67 out of 100) and strength (33 out of 100), while 'Nutrition Standards' had the lowest comprehensiveness score (41 out of 100), and 'Communication and Evaluation' had the lowest strength score (0 out of 100). CONCLUSIONS: All services have a nutrition policy, but there are opportunities to enhance both the content and linguistic strength of statements within policies related to nutrition domains. SO WHAT?: There is a clear need to improve the comprehensiveness and strength of written statements in nutrition policies across all four domains, particularly 'Nutrition Standards' and 'Communication and Evaluation'.

Barriers and enablers to a healthy food environment in Australian childcare services: Exploring directors' perspectives.

ISSUE ADDRESSED: Early childhood education and care (ECEC) settings are ideal environments to optimise nutrition and positively influence children's food behaviours. However, recent research has identified the need to improve nutrition policies, food provision, and mealtime environments in Australian ECEC settings. This study explored the perceptions of ECEC directors regarding barriers and enablers to a health-promoting food environment within ECEC services. METHODS: Eleven directors from ECEC services in Nerang, Queensland, and surrounding areas, participated in qualitative interviews between March and May 2021. Transcripts were analysed using qualitative content analysis that followed a deductive-inductive approach employing nutrition-related domains from the Wellness Child Care Assessment Tool, these being: (i) nutrition policy; (ii) nutrition education; (iii) food provision; and (iv) mealtimes. Transcripts were coded independently by two researchers in NVivo and consensus for barriers and enablers was achieved through discussion. RESULTS: Barriers and enablers were reported across four domains (nutrition policy, nutrition education, food provision, and mealtimes). Comprehensive nutrition-related policies were an enabler to a healthy nutrition environment but were sometimes described as lacking detail or customisation to the service. Nutrition education for children was described as competing with other activities for time and resources in an already-crowded curriculum. Financial and time pressures faced by families were a barrier to healthy food provision in services where families provided food for children. The ability of staff to sit with children and engage in conversation during mealtimes was an enabler; however, competing demands on time and the unavailability of food for staff were cited as barriers to health-promoting mealtimes. CONCLUSIONS: Directors in ECEC services report both barriers and enablers to a healthy food environment. Nutrition policies were an enabler when comprehensive and relevant but a barrier when vague and not tailored to the service environment. ECEC services should be supported to develop and implement service-specific nutrition policies and practices by engaging with parents and staff. SO WHAT?: The barriers and enablers reported in this study should be considered when designing and implementing future evidence-based interventions to improve the nutrition environment in ECEC services.

Developing the Quality in Nutrition Care Model for Dietitians (QUINCE-MOD) in primary care: A mixed-method survey of healthcare consumers and professionals.

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based models are effective tools for informing quality improvement activities in health care. The Quality in Nutrition Care (QUINCE) model is an evidence-based model that describes quality nutrition care in the primary care setting but has not been applied to primary care dietetics. The present study comprised two phases. In the first phase, the study aimed to evaluate and compare healthcare consumers and professional perspectives on the importance of the 10 statements to understand their relevance for dietetics care. In the second phase, the study aimed to test and enhance the QUINCE model using healthcare consumer and professional responses to statements that were identified as relevant to primary care dietetics in the first phase. METHODS: Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using an online survey comprising statements describing quality dietetic care adapted from the complexity literature. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistical analysis to investigate statement importance as rated by participants using a six-point Likert scale. Qualitative content analysis was performed on the qualitative data using a deductive-inductive approach to identify patterns in the data. The QUINCE model was compared with identified patterns and modified as appropriate. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen consumers and 107 primary care professionals agreed on the importance of seven statements but expressed divergent views on the remaining three statements that addressed: (1) access to medical records; (2) access to performance and safety information; and (3) variation in care between dietitians. The QUINCE model was modified to produce the Quality in Nutrition Care Model for Dietitians (QUINCE-MOD) describing quality dietetic care in the primary care setting. CONCLUSIONS: Consumers and professionals share views on some aspects of quality dietetic care but diverge on other aspects. The QUINCE-MOD is an evidence-based, complexity-informed model that describes components of quality relevant to primary care dietetics. The model should be applied at the practice level to reflect the unique perspective of quality at that level.

Developing the EQUIPED approach to quality management using multi-grounded theory.

AIM: This study aimed to develop a theoretical approach to quality management for dietetics services operating in primary care settings in Australia. METHODS: Multi-grounded theory was used to develop a theoretical approach to quality management across three phases. A preliminary approach was developed in the first phase using empirical data outlining quality management activities employed by primary care dietetics services. In the second phase, the preliminary approach was matched to theoretical data captured from the Australian National Safety and Quality in Primary and Community Healthcare Standards, the Quality in Nutrition Care Model for Dietitians, and complex adaptive systems theory. Central concepts were defined and described in the final phase. RESULTS: Seventeen small (n = 7) and medium-large (n = 10) dietetics services from all Australian states and territories, except Tasmania, participated. The theoretical approach to quality management comprised 107 rules organised into six attractors (culture, integrated care, evidence-based care, safe environment and care, client partnerships and personalised care) and 10 governance elements. Rules had one or more foci that aimed to: improve quality within the service (internally focused), improve care by influencing other healthcare professionals (externally focused), improve the client relationship (client-focused), or monitor and respond to external systems (system-focused). CONCLUSIONS: The theoretical approach developed in this study produced a set of rules that primary care dietetics services can use to inform quality management activities. The use of multi-grounded theory should be investigated in other healthcare disciplines and settings to address quality.

A novel perspective of Australian primary care dietetics: Insights from an exploratory study using complex adaptive systems theory.

AIMS: Effective quality improvement strategies are essential to enhancing outcomes of dietetic care. Interventions informed by complex adaptive systems theory have demonstrated effectiveness in other healthcare settings. This study aimed to explore primary care dietetics practice using complex adaptive systems theory and to identify factors that individuals across the healthcare system can examine and address to improve the quality of dietetic care. METHODS: Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews of healthcare consumers and professionals involved in the provision of dietetic care. Data collection and analysis was guided by a complexity-informed conceptual framework. The Framework Method was used to code transcripts and identify themes describing primary care dietetics. RESULTS: Twenty-three consumers and 26 primary care professionals participated. Participants described dietetic care as being delivered by individuals organised into formal and informal systems that were influenced by the wider environment, including legal, economic, and socio-cultural systems. Dietitians described interactions with consumers as a learning opportunity and sought education, mentoring, or supervision to address knowledge and skill gaps. Relationships underpinned transfer of information between individuals. CONCLUSION: Complex adaptive systems theory proved to be a useful conceptual framework for primary care dietetics. Factors identified at the macro (e.g., funding), meso (e.g., professional networks), and micro (e.g., consumer education) levels should be examined and addressed to improve the quality of dietetic care.

How do patients want to receive nutrition care? Qualitative findings from Australian health consumers.

This qualitative descriptive study explored health consumers' preferences for receiving nutrition care in Australian primary care. The study was underpinned by a constructivist research paradigm. Semistructured telephone interviews were conducted with 25 health consumers (age 19-78 years; 19 female) from across Australia between May and August 2020. Content analysis, using an inductive approach revealed emergent themes. was used to reveal emergent themes. Five themes were identified in the data: (1) health consumers want to receive nutrition care from a qualified person; (2) nutrition care is viewed as important, and health consumers want to receive it in a format that meets their needs; (3) nutrition care should be low cost and available to everyone; (4) nutrition care services should be conveniently located; and (5) health consumers want nutrition care to be offered frequently, across their lifespan. Health consumers have a clear idea of how they would like to receive nutrition care in the primary care setting, but reported challenges to receiving this care within the current system. New models of service delivery are needed to meet the needs of health consumers.

The Quality in Nutrition Care (QUINCE) model: development of a model based on Australian healthcare consumer perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Primary healthcare is the ideal setting to address diet-related disease through delivery of nutrition services. However, quality nutrition care has not previously been defined from the healthcare consumer perspective. OBJECTIVES: To explore, and develop a theoretical model of, healthcare consumer expectations of quality nutrition care in the primary healthcare setting. METHODS: A qualitative study design collected data describing healthcare consumer expectations of nutrition care. Consumers were recruited through social media and research networks, screened, and invited to participate in a semi-structured telephone interview. Interviews explored experiences and views of nutrition care. Interviews were thematically analysed, and informed development of a model using an iterative process. RESULTS: Twenty-three healthcare consumers participated in an interview. Five themes were identified. The Quality in Nutrition Care consumer model developed from these themes comprised 5 interconnected components, these being: (i) quality nutrition care occurs within an integrated societal system; (ii) quality nutrition care is available, accessible, and affordable; (iii) quality nutrition care is up-to-date and evidence based; (iv) quality nutrition care is underpinned by positive relationships; and (v) quality nutrition care is personalized to consumer needs. CONCLUSIONS: The consumer-derived model of quality nutrition care can be used by providers to inform activities that enhance primary healthcare practice, outcomes, and impact. The model has important implications for primary healthcare system reform and policy. Future research should explore the provision of dietetic services in primary care, with specific focus on factors that influence quality care, and investigate how quality is monitored and improved.

Quality improvement strategies enhance primary care dietetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Quality improvement strategies have been widely applied in health care; however, little is known about their use in primary care dietetics. This review aims to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of quality improvement strategies that seek to improve patient outcomes by enhancing dietetic care compared to standard dietetic care. METHODS: The study employed a systematic review and meta-analysis design following PRISMA guidelines and included studies up to March 2021. Studies were included if they used a randomised controlled trial (RCT) design to evaluate the effect of a quality improvement strategy applied to care delivered by a dietitian on patient outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted where there were sufficient studies with homogeneous populations and outcome measures. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs (n = 1604) met the inclusion criteria for review and five studies (n = 511) were eligible for meta-analysis for glycated haemoglobin in patients with type 2 diabetes. The most frequently reported quality improvement strategies addressed disease management programs (58%), patient education (67%), group care (42%) and patient self-management (42%). A positive intervention effect was reported in 50% of the included studies. A low grade of evidence supported a positive intervention effect for quality improvement intervention by a dietitian for glycated haemoglobin (pooled mean difference = -0.39% with 95% confidence interval = -0.70 to -0.08, p = 0.01) in n = 511 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions aimed at enhancing quality in primary care dietetic practice support improvements in patient outcomes. Further research on quality improvement interventions for patient outcomes is required to strengthen the evidence base in this important topic.

Perceptions of private practice dietitians regarding the collection and use of outcomes data in primary healthcare practices: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Dietitians working in private practices in primary settings provide nutrition care to support individuals with the prevention and management of chronic disease. A better understanding of the type and usage of data collected by dietitians in this setting may provide insights to optimise the effectiveness and impact of the workforce. The present study explored the perceptions of leading Australian private practice dietitians on the collection and usage of data in their practice. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study of Australian private practice dietitians, recruited by snowball sampling, was conducted on their perceptions and attitudes towards collecting and using data. Data were collected by semi-structured interviews and all interview data were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-three dietitians participated. Five themes emerged: (i) collecting data is challenging, nuanced, unclearly defined and therefore not routinely carried out; (ii) consistent data collection processes are impeded by the diversity of practise and practices; (iii) business-related data collection is essential for sustainable dietetic services; (iv) clinical outcomes are fundamental to dietetic services; and (v) standardised, integrated systems are needed to enable routine data collection and synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate the rudimentary role business acumen has in practice viability and provides evidence to potentially re-shape the future of dietetic education in Australia. Private practice dietitians may benefit from tools and training that enable consistent collection of data about their services. Such data could enable benchmarking across the workforce and contribute to a broader understanding of dietetic impact on public health.

Innovation at the Edge of Nutrition Education Research.

The fundamental role of diet in maximizing human health and utility is now universally recognized [...].